Obama calls for better business plans from executives at Chrysler and General Motors - - Motor Age - Automotive training, certification & parts info
Obama calls for better business plans from executives at Chrysler and General Motors

Source: Motor Age

Here is the text of President Barack Obama’s address this morning concerning the fate of General Motors and Chrysler:

One of the challenges we have confronted from the beginning of this administration is what to do about the state of our struggling auto industry. In recent months, my Auto Task Force has been reviewing requests by General Motors and Chrysler for additional government assistance as well as plans developed by each of these companies to restructure, modernize, and make themselves more competitive. Our evaluation is now complete. But before I lay out what needs to be done going forward, I want to say a few words about where we are, and what led us to this point.

It will come as a surprise to no one that some of the Americans who have suffered most during this recession have been those in the auto industry and those working for companies that support it. Over the past year, our auto industry has shed over 400,000 jobs, not only at the plants that produce cars but at the businesses that produce the parts that go into them, and the dealers that sell and repair them. More than one in ten Michigan residents is out of work – the most of any state. And towns and cities across the great Midwest have watched unemployment climb higher than it’s been in decades.

The pain being felt in places that rely on our auto industry is not the fault of our workers, who labor tirelessly and desperately want to see their companies succeed. And it is not the fault of all the families and communities that supported manufacturing plants throughout the generations. Rather, it is a failure of leadership – from Washington to Detroit – that led our auto companies to this point.

Year after year, decade after decade, we have seen problems papered-over and tough choices kicked down the road, even as foreign competitors outpaced us. Well, we have reached the end of that road. And we, as a nation, cannot afford to shirk responsibility any longer. Now is the time to confront our problems head-on and do what’s necessary to solve them.

We cannot, we must not, and we will not let our auto industry simply vanish. This industry is, like no other, an emblem of the American spirit; a once and future symbol of America’s success. It is what helped build the middle class and sustained it throughout the 20th century. It is a source of deep pride for the generations of American workers whose hard work and imagination led to some of the finest cars the world has ever known. It is a pillar of our economy that has held up the dreams of millions of our people. But we also cannot continue to excuse poor decisions. And we cannot make the survival of our auto industry dependent on an unending flow of tax dollars. These companies – and this industry – must ultimately stand on their own, not as wards of the state.

That is why the federal government provided General Motors and Chrysler with emergency loans to prevent their sudden collapse at the end of last year – only on the condition that they would develop plans to restructure. In keeping with that agreement, each company has submitted a plan to restructure. But after careful analysis, we have determined that neither goes far enough to warrant the substantial new investments that these companies are requesting. And so today, I am announcing that my administration will offer GM and Chrysler a limited period of time to work with creditors, unions, and other stakeholders to fundamentally restructure in a way that would justify an investment of additional tax dollars; a period during which they must produce plans that would give the American people confidence in their long-term prospects for success.

What we are asking is difficult. It will require hard choices by companies. It will require unions and workers who have already made painful concessions to make even more. It will require creditors to recognize that they cannot hold out for the prospect of endless government bailouts. Only then can we ask American taxpayers who have already put up so much of their hard-earned money to once more invest in a revitalized auto industry. But I am confident that if we are each willing to do our part, then this restructuring, as painful as it will be in the short-term, will mark not an end, but a new beginning for a great American industry; an auto industry that is once more out-competing the world; a 21st century auto industry that is creating new jobs, unleashing new prosperity, and manufacturing the fuel-efficient cars and trucks that will carry us toward an energy independent future. I am absolutely committed to working with Congress and the auto companies to meet one goal: the United States of America will lead the world in building the next generation of clean cars.

No one can deny that our auto industry has made meaningful progress in recent years. Some of the cars made by American workers are now outperforming the best cars made abroad. In 2008, the North American Car of the Year was a GM. This year, Buick tied for first place as the most reliable car in the world. And our companies are investing in breakthrough technologies that hold the promise of new vehicles that will help America end its addiction to foreign oil.

But our auto industry is not moving in the right direction fast enough to succeed. So let me discuss what measures need to be taken by each of the auto companies requesting taxpayer assistance, starting with General Motors. While GM has made a good faith effort to restructure over the past several months, the plan they have put forward is, in its current form, not strong enough. However, after broad consultations with a range of industry experts and financial advisors, I’m confident that GM can rise again, provided that it undergoes a fundamental restructuring. As an initial step, GM is announcing today that Rick Wagoner is stepping aside as Chairman and CEO. This is not meant as a condemnation of Mr. Wagoner, who has devoted his life to this company; rather, it’s a recognition that it will take a new vision and new direction to create the GM of the future.

In this context, my administration will offer General Motors adequate working capital over the next 60 days. During this time, my team will be working closely with GM to produce a better business plan. They must ask themselves: have they consolidated enough unprofitable brands? Have they cleaned up their balance sheets or are they still saddled with so much debt that they can’t make future investments? And above all, have they created a credible model for how to not only survive, but succeed in this competitive global market? Let me be clear: the United States government has no interest or intention of running GM. What we are interested in is giving GM an opportunity to finally make those much-needed changes that will let them emerge from this crisis a stronger and more competitive company.

The situation at Chrysler is more challenging. It is with deep reluctance but also a clear-eyed recognition of the facts that we have determined, after a careful review, that Chrysler needs a partner to remain viable. Recently, Chrysler reached out and found what could be a potential partner – the international car company Fiat, where the current management team has executed an impressive turnaround. Fiat is prepared to transfer its cutting-edge technology to Chrysler and, after working closely with my team, has committed to building new fuel-efficient cars and engines here in America. We have also secured an agreement that will ensure that Chrysler repays taxpayers for any new investments that are made before Fiat is allowed to take a majority ownership stake in Chrysler.

Still, such a deal would require an additional investment of tax dollars, and there are a number of hurdles that must be overcome to make it work. I am committed to doing all I can to see if a deal can be struck in a way that upholds the interests of American taxpayers. That is why we will give Chrysler and Fiat 30 days to overcome these hurdles and reach a final agreement – and we will provide Chrysler with adequate capital to continue operating during that time. If they are able to come to a sound agreement that protects American taxpayers, we will consider lending up to $6 billion to help their plan succeed. But if they and their stakeholders are unable to reach such an agreement, and in the absence of any other viable partnership, we will not be able to justify investing additional tax dollar to keep Chrysler in business.

While Chrysler and GM are very different companies with very different paths forward, both need a fresh start to implement the restructuring plans they develop. That may mean using our bankruptcy code as a mechanism to help them restructure quickly and emerge stronger. Now, I know that when people even hear the word “bankruptcy” it can be a bit unsettling, so let me explain what I mean. What I am talking about is using our existing legal structure as a tool that, with the backing of the U.S. government, can make it easier for General Motors and Chrysler to quickly clear away old debts that are weighing them down so they can get back on their feet and onto a path to success; a tool that we can use, even as workers are staying on the job building cars that are being sold. What I am not talking about is a process where a company is broken up, sold off, and no longer exists. And what I am not talking about is having a company stuck in court for years, unable to get out.

It is my hope that the steps I am announcing today will go a long way toward answering many of the questions people may have about the future of GM and Chrysler. But just in case there are still nagging doubts, let me say it as plainly as I can – if you buy a car from Chrysler or General Motors, you will be able to get your car serviced and repaired, just like always. Your warrantee will be safe. In fact, it will be safer than it’s ever been. Because starting today, the United States government will stand behind your warrantee.

But we must also recognize that the difficulties facing this industry are due in no small part to the weakness in our economy. Therefore, to support demand for auto sales during this period, I’m directing my team to take several steps. First, we will ensure that Recovery Act funds to purchase government cars go out as quickly as possible and work through the budget process to accelerate other federal fleet purchases as well. Second, we will accelerate our efforts through the Treasury Department’s Consumer and Business Lending Initiative. And we are working intensively with the auto finance companies to increase the flow of credit to both consumers and dealers. Third, the IRS is today launching a campaign to alert consumers of a new tax benefit for auto purchases made between February 16th and the end of this year – if you buy a car anytime this year, you may be able to deduct the cost of any sales and excise taxes. This provision could save families hundreds of dollars and lead to as many as 100,000 new car sales.

Finally, several members of Congress have proposed an even more ambitious incentive program to increase car sales while modernizing our auto fleet. Such fleet modernization programs, which provide a generous credit to consumers who turn in old, less fuel efficient cars and purchase cleaner cars have been successful in boosting auto sales in a number of European countries. I want to work with Congress to identify parts of the Recovery Act that could be trimmed to fund such a program, and make it retroactive starting today.

Let there be no doubt, it will take an unprecedented effort on all our parts – from the halls of Congress to the boardroom, from the union hall to the factory floor – to see the auto industry through these difficult times. But I want every American to know that the path I am laying out today is our best chance to make sure the cars of the future are built where they’ve always been built – in Detroit and across the Midwest; to make America’s auto industry in the 21st century what it was in the 20th century – unsurpassed around the world. This path has been chosen after consulting with other governments that are facing this crisis. We have worked closely with the Government of Canada on GM and Chrysler, as both companies have extensive operations there. The Canadian Government has indicated its support for our approach and will be announcing their specific commitments later today.

While the steps I am talking about will have an impact on all Americans, some of our fellow citizens will be affected more than any others. And so I’d like to speak directly to all those men and women who work in the auto industry or live in the countless communities that depend on it. Many of you have been going through tough times for longer than you’d care to remember. And I will not pretend the tough times are over. I cannot promise you there isn’t more pain to come. But what I can promise you is this – I will fight for you. You are the reason I am here today. I got my start fighting for working families in the shadows of a shuttered steel plant and I wake up every single day asking myself what I can do to give you and working people all across this country a fair shot at the American dream.

When a community is struck by a natural disaster, the nation responds to put it back on its feet. While the storm that’s hit our auto towns is not a tornado or a hurricane, the damage is clear, and we must respond. That is why today, I am designating a new Director of Recovery for Auto Communities and Workers to cut through red tape and ensure that the full resources of our federal government are leveraged to assist the workers, communities, and regions that rely on our auto industry. Edward Montgomery, a former Deputy Labor Secretary, has agreed to serve in this role. Together with Labor Secretary Solis and my Auto Task Force, Ed will help provide support to auto workers and their families, and open up opportunity in manufacturing communities. Michigan, Ohio, Indiana, and every other state that relies on the auto industry will have a strong advocate in Ed. He will direct a comprehensive effort that will help lift up the hardest hit areas by using the unprecedented levels of funding available in our Recovery Act and throughout our government to create new manufacturing jobs and new businesses where they are needed most – in your communities. And he will also lead an effort to identify new initiatives we may need to help support your communities going forward.

These efforts, as essential as they are, will not make everything better overnight. There are jobs that cannot be saved. There are plants that will not reopen. And there is little I can say that can subdue the anger or ease the frustration of all whose livelihoods hang in the balance because of failures that weren’t theirs.

But there is something I want everyone to remember. Remember that it is precisely in times like these – in moments of trial, and moments of hardship – that Americans rediscover the ingenuity and resilience that makes us who we are. That made the auto industry what it once was. That sent those first mass-produced cars rolling off assembly lines. That built an arsenal of democracy that propelled America to victory in the Second World War. And that powered our economic prowess in the first American century.

Because I know that if we can tap into that same ingenuity and resilience right now; if we can carry one another through this difficult time and do what must be done; then we will look back and say that this was the moment when America’s auto industry shed its old ways, marched into the future, and remade itself, once more, into an engine of opportunity and prosperity, not only in Detroit, and not only in our Midwest, but all across America.

Got something to say about it? Post it here!
 Posted 2009-03-30 16:35:07.0
Obama's support for 'Cash for Clunkers' bills will eliminate many of the vehicles we sell parts for. Keep in mind that even though few SS396 Chevelles (for example) would get junked, the run of the mill 6 cyl Chevelles that supply fenders, etc. and make the hobby accessible for many will disappear. The older pickup trucks and vans we support are also an obvious target. I don't understand why the government is turning it's back on the free market. And I don't know that, in the current environment, we can withstand this assault.
 Posted 2009-03-30 16:41:01.0
Why conditions on the automotive "bailout" and NOT any condition on the financial & insurance companies handovers? Those are the people who created problems for the automotive industry to begin with! It appears that certain government officials knowing that the car has 4 wheels will start kibiccing how to design "efficient" automobile. American automobiles are extremely competetive & dependable! From THE LAST (=the worst) 4 IN VEHICLE DEPENDABILITY STUDY, 2 are Japanese then German VW and British Land Rover! Even maligned Chrysler vehicles are above average in that Study! It is that "middle class" have no money to spend on the new cars. Silly scheme to crash "older" or fuel "inefficient vehicles" is exactly that! You crash someone's car - he/she gets tazpayers $5000.- and what NEW car can be bought for that? Not even a good horse! And as fuel efficiency goes, we (co.) testing NEW Jeep Wrangler with "modern, new" V6 3.8L engine - getting, feather driving 10-14mpg at the best. Our other tester Jeep, 15years old 5.2L V8 ww. 150Kmiles gets 14-20mpg! Which one "to crash"??? The government can encourage refineries to go hydroref. to produce more diesel fuel, lower Fed. tax from 24c to 18c (like gas) or lower. Diesel engines are 10-20%more efficient than gasoline, esp. in trucks, giving (we tested) 100% better fuel consumption (from 11mpg gas to 23mpg diesel on the same SUV)! Bottom line, you can submit fabulous Plans, but if people buying or suppliers manufacturing parts, do not credit from the sick Financiers (they rather write themselves bonuses) what good is such plan for? Oh, Fiat - marvelous, does anyone know that FPT works 2 days a week, changes mangement weekly, yes they made promises and then dissapear, we had almost lost money on the promised engines, which never appeared; Fiat ain't Daimler! Who is sicker at this stage-would say Fiat!
 Posted 2009-03-30 17:29:02.0
I hope these IRS Tax benefits for new car buyers only will apply for US made cars! What about other efforts to encourage people to buy American brand cars? Further it is a disgrace that government agencies and public services like (Police Departments, Parking Enforcement, Power- and Gas Companies etc.) purchase Japanese cars. The same goes for American Corporations and Rental Car Companies. It makes me sick! For those of you who think it’s OK to by a foreign car witch is assembled in the US I got to advise you that probably 80% of all the parts still come from abroad, therefore most of the profits go out of country . HELP YOR COUNTRY AND YOUR NEIGHBOR BUY AMERICAN!! Robi
 Posted 2009-03-31 23:38:48.0
The fundamental problems with the entire industry begin with our own willingness to buy car parts made abroad. For those of us in the auto repair industry, it is evident every time we open a box with GM on the label that says, "made in Canada", China, or "Hecho en Mexico". Look at the first digit of the "American" car you're driving, if it's not a "1", it was not assembled here. If it was assembled here, it was probably assembled with parts made in Mexico, China, and Canada. How could we manufacture parts here and remain competitive against a work force who would risk their life to go to work in a factory with no OSHA standards, no pension plan, no sick days, no corporate taxes, and wages that we could not even consider. Part of the problem is the America worker and our lack of ethics and pride, and expectations beyond reason. The other part of the problem is the "Free" trade agreement. If a country is not buying from us at the same pace we are buying from them, there is a problem. I wonder what a "tarrif" is and what it is used for? Even the playing field and make it profitable for companies to manufacture here and create jobs for our abundant American workforce that is hopefully willing to give 100% every day and be greatful to have a job. For those of you that have any money, buy American goods if you can find any.
 Posted 2009-04-07 09:30:35.0
this is a bad thing when our free enterprizes systems are steped on by the goverment and will not let businesses fail. wars have been fought over such acts. my beleif over all of this is to let gm and chrysler fail. claiming bankruptcy and not have to pay their bills will only kill the small businesses that were building parts for them. if you let them claim bankruptcy then everyone envolved will claim bankruptcy and this will snowball out of proportion. so ether way its a very bad thing. i have to think so gloomy.
 Posted 2009-06-01 16:35:12.0
if goverment is the answer we already lost the american dream. if a person looks outside themselves and their faith in God for their needs they are still slaves with a new master.freedom is in the heart and soul of a people and can only be realized through overcoming hard times with personal responsabillity.the people you are so concerned with had many great years of excess income, it is not the rest of the countrys fault they did not save and prepare for tough times. i myself and many of my friends have lived on a lot less than most of these people and because of responsible living would not be looking for a hand out from our goverment in the event we lost our job.the american people looking for a hand out should be ashamed of themselves.but a political party that seeks to impower itself by convincing people they are victims and goverment is the answer is and abomination.
 Posted 2009-06-01 20:19:58.0
Letting the OEM's fail would be a tough situation, but let us not prop them up at everyones expense. How about equal consideration to the independents. The 10 independent repair shops to every dealer is what almost keeps the dealers honest. Boosting the dealers, giving them more new cars to service on the taxpayer's dime, while removing the older, less expensive cars that the independents service, is just sending our bread and butter to the crusher. So much for the American way and support of the small business person. I guess we do not have a big enough lobby.
Read More Comments
post a comment
Your email address will NOT be published.
appears with your comment
read our privacy policy
Note: does not support HTML
All comments submitted are subject to review and may be delayed before posting. We reserve the right to not publish comments.
SERVICE REPAIR NEWS
Yokohama eager to get rolling with ALMS enhancements
Mitchell 1 signs agreement with National Roadside Service
Honest-1 service chain donating 60,000 trees for forest reclamation
New ATE catalog covers Asian, Domestic and European vehicles from 1980 through 2010
CARB approves EVI zero-emission vehicles

Source: Motor Age,
Click here